Securing the RTP Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution
RFC 7202

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
16 (System) Notify list changed from avt-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory@ietf.org, tom111.taylor@bell.net to tom111.taylor@bell.net, avt-chairs@ietf.org
2014-04-14
16 (System) RFC published
2014-04-11
16 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2014-04-03
16 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2014-03-21
16 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2014-01-23
16 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2014-01-23
16 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2014-01-23
16 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2014-01-23
16 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2014-01-23
16 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2014-01-23
16 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2014-01-23
16 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2014-01-23
16 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2014-01-23
16 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2014-01-23
16 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2014-01-16
16 Benoît Claise [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS
2014-01-16
16 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-01-16
16 Magnus Westerlund New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-16.txt
2014-01-16
15 Magnus Westerlund IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2014-01-16
15 Magnus Westerlund New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-15.txt
2013-12-30
14 Gunter Van de Velde Closed request for Last Call review by OPSDIR with state 'No Response'
2013-12-19
14 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation
2013-12-19
14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Thanks for working this through over >1 generation
of security AD.

Do you really need this bit:

For a framework protocol, it appears ...
2013-12-19
14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-12-19
14 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-12-19
14 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I know this has been a long time in the making.  I have to admit I've never loved the idea of no MTI ...
2013-12-19
14 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-12-18
14 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot comment]
I await the arrival of

draft-ietf-avt-srtp-a-really-good-idea-and-heres-how-for-your-usage
2013-12-18
14 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-12-18
14 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
This document does a good job to list the different "RTP Applications and Deployment Scenarios" in section 2.
Then, when it gets interesting, ...
2013-12-18
14 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-12-18
14 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-12-17
14 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot comment]
I appreciate the work that has gone into this doc. Thank you for seeing it through.
2013-12-17
14 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-12-17
14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-12-17
14 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-12-17
14 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-12-16
14 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-12-16
14 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I am not quite comfortable with the discussion of interoperability. I do
buy the argument of the document, but I don't see how, ...
2013-12-16
14 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-12-10
14 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-12-09
14 Cindy Morgan Created "Approve" ballot
2013-12-09
14 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-12-09
14 Richard Barnes Ballot has been issued
2013-12-09
14 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-12-09
14 Richard Barnes Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2013-12-09
14 Richard Barnes Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-12-19
2013-12-09
14 Richard Barnes State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-12-06
14 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call (ends 2013-12-06)
2013-11-28
14 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Bernard Aboba
2013-11-28
14 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Bernard Aboba
2013-11-26
14 Vijay Gurbani Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani.
2013-11-26
14 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-11-26
14 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14, which is
currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that, upon approval of this document, ...
2013-11-25
14 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani
2013-11-25
14 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani
2013-11-22
14 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-11-22
14 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <avt@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt> ...
2013-11-22
14 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call (ends 2010-05-27) from Last Call Requested
2013-11-22
14 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was generated
2013-11-22
14 Richard Barnes Last call was requested
2013-11-22
14 Richard Barnes Ballot approval text was generated
2013-11-22
14 Richard Barnes State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-11-22
14 Richard Barnes Ballot writeup was changed
2013-11-04
14 Richard Barnes State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from Publication Requested
2013-10-31
14 Roni Even IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication
2013-10-31
14 Roni Even IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2013-10-31
14 Roni Even Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication
2013-10-31
14 Roni Even IESG state set to Publication Requested
2013-10-31
14 Roni Even Changed document writeup
2013-10-30
14 Roni Even IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2013-10-15
14 Colin Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt
2013-09-04
13 Roni Even IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from Submitted to IESG for Publication
2013-05-07
13 Colin Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13.txt
2013-03-13
12 Cindy Morgan Shepherding AD changed to Richard Barnes
2013-02-25
12 Colin Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-12.txt
2012-11-28
11 Robert Sparks State changed to AD is watching from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-11-28
11 Robert Sparks The working group is going to review these changes and re pub-req the document
2012-11-20
11 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I cleared.  Thank you for working through this.
2012-11-20
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-11-19
11 Stephen Farrell [Ballot comment]

Many many thanks for working through this. We finally got it!
2012-11-19
11 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-11-19
11 Colin Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-11.txt
2012-11-14
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Updated based on -10 and discussions Stephen and I had followed by additional discussions Stephen had with the authors.  Much of this comes ...
2012-11-14
10 Sean Turner Ballot discuss text updated for Sean Turner
2012-10-26
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

This review is of version -10 of the draft.
This is definitely on the right track.

1. section 2 says that there's too ...
2012-10-26
10 Stephen Farrell Ballot discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2012-10-22
10 Colin Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-10.txt
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-07-16
09 Colin Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-09.txt
2011-11-16
08 Magnus Westerlund Submitted a long time for publication
2011-11-16
08 Magnus Westerlund IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2011-10-31
08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-10-31
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-08.txt
2011-03-31
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Taking this over from Tim and agreeing with him.

This is a joint discuss from both Security ADs.  Given the importance of
this ...
2011-03-31
08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-08-26
08 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-26
08 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-08-26
08 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Note: This is a joint discuss from both Security ADs.  Given the importance of this
document, we are both holding a discuss position ...
2010-08-26
08 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-08-26
08 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Note: This is a joint discuss from both Security ADs.  Given the importance of this
document, we are both holding a discuss position ...
2010-08-26
08 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-08-25
08 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
I support Russ's DISCUSS
2010-08-25
08 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-08-24
08 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
This is a very much needed document, well written, and makes IMO the
right conclusions.

I did have two issues, however, but decided ...
2010-08-24
08 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-08-24
08 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-08-24
08 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
This draft seems to say that BCP 61 does not apply to RTP.  BCP 61
  describes the "Danvers Doctrine", which says that ...
2010-08-24
08 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
This draft seems to say that BCP 61 does not apply to RTP.  BCP 61
  describes the "Danvers Doctrine", which says that ...
2010-08-24
08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-08-24
08 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. In Section 1: s/Section 2 describes the scenarios in which RTP is deployed./Section 2 describes the most widely encountered scenarios in which ...
2010-08-24
08 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
This document does a good job in building the case that SRTP is not universally fit as a security solution for all use ...
2010-08-24
08 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-08-23
08 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 3., paragraph 4:
>    [ETSI.TS.102.474], where one mode of operation uses ISMAcryp
>    (http://www.isma.tv/specs/ISMA_E&Aspec2.0.pdf) to encrypt the RTP ...
2010-08-23
08 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-08-15
08 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-08-11
08 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-08-04
08 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-08-01
08 Robert Sparks Telechat date has been changed to 2010-08-26 from 2010-08-12 by Robert Sparks
2010-07-21
08 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Robert Sparks
2010-07-20
08 Robert Sparks Telechat date has been changed to 2010-08-12 from None by Robert Sparks
2010-07-20
08 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-08-12 by Robert Sparks
2010-07-20
08 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2010-07-20
08 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued by Robert Sparks
2010-07-20
08 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2010-07-01
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-07.txt
2010-06-30
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-06.txt
2010-06-20
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Sam Hartman.
2010-05-27
08 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-05-24
08 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-05-14
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2010-05-14
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2010-05-13
08 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-05-13
08 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-13
08 Robert Sparks State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Robert Sparks
2010-05-13
08 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested by Robert Sparks
2010-05-13
08 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-05-13
08 (System) Last call text was added
2010-05-12
08 Robert Sparks State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Robert Sparks
2010-05-12
08 Robert Sparks [Note]: 'Tom Taylor (tom111.taylor@bell.net) is PROTO Shepherd.' added by Robert Sparks
2010-05-06
08 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Tom Taylor (tom111.taylor@bell.net) is PROTO Shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-06
08 Cindy Morgan
This draft was put together by key AVT experts to help the IESG understand why
SRTP is not always required for secure transport of media. ...
2010-05-06
08 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-01-22
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-05.txt
2009-12-22
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-04.txt
2009-07-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-03.txt
2009-03-09
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-02.txt
2008-11-04
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-01.txt
2008-07-29
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-00.txt