Object Identifiers for Test Certificate Policies
RFC 7229
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) Yes
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes
- To be honest, I'm not clear why this was needed really but I guess it was part of some NIST test suite work and its fine to record that. Anyway, once the OIDs are assigned for this, then recording it is correct. - I'd suggest s/has a/can have a/ in the 2nd sentence in section 3. - section 4: are these OIDs going to be part of the new PKIX IANA OID registries? I assume so and they'll be registered for that via some other document? Would it be nice to also name that IANA registry here though? (At the expense of holding this up until that is done.)
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
From the Gen-ART review by Francis Dupont:
- typo 3 page 2:
... The actual
polices used for production certificates has a significant impact
^
BTW if the word is policies than has -> have
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection