Skip to main content

Interworking between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Presence
RFC 7248

Yes

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -07)

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss) Yes
Yes (2014-02-09)
This last version (and some conversation from the author) has answered my concerns with this document. Thanks.
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -07)

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -07)

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -07)

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-02-06 for -07)
If the protocol between the gateways is not protected via
(D)TLS, then doesn't this (and probabaly all other gateway
functions) act in a potentially privacy unfriendly manner?
I would have thought that worth noting at least, e.g. say
that if (D)TLS is not used when gatewaying then the user
has lost whatever security they used to have for their
presence. (See also my comment on stox-core wrt turning on
or requiring implementation of (D)TLS beteen gateways.)

Sorry - forgot to note the change resulting from the
secdir review [1] just in case it gets forgotten in a 
rush of some sort.

   [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04581.html
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)

                            
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07)