Skip to main content

GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Configuration
RFC 7260

Yes


No Objection

(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

Yes (2014-02-26)
IANA issues have been discussed and resolved to my satisfaction

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2014-02-25)
Than you for addressing my DISCUSS and comments in version -13.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-01-21 for -12)
lools like -12 addressed outstanding opsdir comments.

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-01-22 for -12)
Thanks for clearly identifying the new security consideration and explaining how it can be mitigated.

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-01-22 for -12)
This is a well written document and I just have a few nits that you might consider.

There were a number of terms that as far as I could see were unexpanded on first use and are not "well known". I picked up DWDM, RSVP-TE, LSP, WSON, TDM, SDH/SONET. Please can I suggest an quick abbreviation scrub.

With the text "the ADMIN_STATUS Object is specified for RSVP-TE in [RFC3473]. "  This ref should go a little earlier in the para, when you first use the term

"If this is not possible, a PathErr SHOULD be sent "
and
"a ResvErr may be sent"

Presumable these are "messages" or "responses"


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           Type (IANA)         |           Length              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    OAM Type   |                 Reserved                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   ~                           sub-TLVs                            ~
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Type: indicates a new type: the OAM Configuration TLV (IANA to
   assign).

Is the length syntax well known in this context?