MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the Operational Expectations of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, Optical Transport Network, and Ethernet Transport Network Operators
RFC 7271
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -03)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-03-27 for -03)
Unknown
OPS DIR review by Tina:
Summary: Ready with nits
Line 410, delete 1st 'when'
Line 425, replace 'Switch- over' with 'Switch-over'
Line 453, 'is accepted' can be deleted for redundancy
Line 549, replace 'transmission' with 'received' or delete it, otherwise ‘integrity of the packet transmission’ does not parse
Line 575, delete 'under SD condition' as it is redundant
Line 580-583, the phrases:
"...The packet duplication SHALL continue in the WTR
state in revertive operation and SHALL stop when the node leaves the
WTR state. In non-revertive operation, the packet duplication SHALL
stop when the SD condition is cleared."
should be rewritten as:
"When the SD condition is cleared, in revertive operation, the packet duplication
SHALL continue in the WTR state and SHALL stop when the node leaves the
WTR state; while in non-revertive operation, the packet duplication SHALL stop immediately."
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-03-25 for -03)
Unknown
I only quickly scanned this so maybe I'm totally wrong here but isn't this spec defining new ways in which an operator could break a network manually? If so, isn't that a security consideration? But maybe that's covered in 6378 or 5920 or I'm just talking nonsense:-)
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown