Allocating and Retiring Special-Purpose MPLS Labels
RFC 7274
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
No Objection
(Alissa Cooper)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Ted Lemon)
Recuse
(Adrian Farrel)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-03-21)
No objection here; this all sounds good. Someone might consider whether it's better to correct the grammar of the second sentence in the abstract (I understand what it means to say, but I can't parse it), or let the RFC Editor do it.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-03-27)
Thank you Alia for spending the 1 min to update the abstract. This document is difficult to read, as it's not optimized per question/answer. Look at question 2 in section 2, for which the answer is in section 3, but then points to 3.2 for more details.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-03-24)
This is just a comment, non-blocking, it would be easier to read if section 2. Questions was combined with section 3. Answers.
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-03-22)
- p1: 13 pages and updating 13 RFCs! Is that a record? - p7: What is an IETF-wide survey?
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()