Allocating and Retiring Special-Purpose MPLS Labels
RFC 7274
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
No objection here; this all sounds good. Someone might consider whether it's better to correct the grammar of the second sentence in the abstract (I understand what it means to say, but I can't parse it), or let the RFC Editor do it.
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you Alia for spending the 1 min to update the abstract. This document is difficult to read, as it's not optimized per question/answer. Look at question 2 in section 2, for which the answer is in section 3, but then points to 3.2 for more details.
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
This is just a comment, non-blocking, it would be easier to read if section 2. Questions was combined with section 3. Answers.
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
- p1: 13 pages and updating 13 RFCs! Is that a record? - p7: What is an IETF-wide survey?
(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse