Skip to main content

Unanswered Questions in the Path Computation Element Architecture
RFC 7399

Yes

(Alia Atlas)

No Objection

(Benoît Claise)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)

Recuse

(Adrian Farrel)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -06)

                            

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-07-08 for -06)
Just noting that in Sections 4 and 9, ALTO is not the only protocol to use the RFC 4848 mechanism for server discovery -- discovery of a local location information server (RFC 5986) was previously specified this way and was, I believe, the inspiration for the ALTO mechanism.

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

No Objection (2014-10-06 for -07)
Thanks for making changes to how draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce is used/referenced in the document, and I'm convinced that it is now an informational reference only.  I suggest one change to make it clear that the relevant terminology is adequately explained here, and that the stateful-pce draft is only for additional information:

OLD
   Readers are assumed to be thoroughly familiar with terminology
   defined in [RFC4655], [RFC4726], [RFC5440], [RFC5623], [RFC6805],
   and [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce].

NEW
   Readers are assumed to be thoroughly familiar with terminology
   defined in [RFC4655], [RFC4726], [RFC5440], [RFC5623], and
   [RFC6805].  More information about terms related to stateful PCE
   can be found in [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce].

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

No Objection (2014-10-06 for -07)
Thanks for updating the security considerations and including references to other documents that discuss the considerations.

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-07-08 for -06)
good document!

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse

Recuse (for -06)