Mechanisms for Optimizing Link Aggregation Group (LAG) and Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) Component Link Utilization in Networks
RFC 7424

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.

(Benoît Claise) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-16)
No email
send info
Completely non-blocking comment...

I agree with Adrian that there could be some confusion introduced with classification of flows as described in this document.  It is exacerbated by the categorization illustrated in Figure 1.  I will note that there is research that shows that a multitude of short-lived flows (regardless of their size) may cause more problems than the long-lived large flows focused on in this document.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-16)
No email
send info
the concerns in Carlos' initial opsdir review were addressed

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-16)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review comments.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04851.html

(Adrian Farrel) No Record

Comment (2014-10-16)
No email
send info
   short-lived large
   flows, are referred to as "small flows" in this document

Is that really helpful and not-at-all-confusing?

Well, at least you make the same statement three times in the document.