Transmission of IPv6 Packets over ITU-T G.9959 Networks
RFC 7428
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
I've no objection to the publication of this document. Please note that section 1.1 has "ABR: Authoritative 6LBR ([RFC6775])" without defining "6LBR", but 4.4 has "authoritative border router (ABR)"
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
= Section 5 = o Replace "802.15.4 short address" with "<Interface><G.9959 NodeID>" o Replace "802.15.4 PAN ID" with "G.9959 HomeID" Neither of the terms "802.15.4 short address" nor "802.15.4 PAN ID" appear in RFC 6282 or draft-ietf-6lo-ghc (although "short address" is used in 6282). I think exactly what is being substituted should be made more clear. I was looking because it didn't seem to me that the HomeID is used at all in the format described in this document (right?). So I don't really understand why it would need to be compressed if it is not included at all in the format. But then I looked in the documents about compression and could not figure out what it is supposed to correspond to since the PAN ID does not appear. If the HomeID is used somehow, then I think the privacy considerations text (which is generally great!) need to be extended to cover that, since the claims made about uniqueness/persistence of the NodeID do not apply to HomeID+NodeID.
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
In Section 2.3: s/section Section 3/Section 3/
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for adding text on logging concerns related to privacy.
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
I cringed at just about every MUST. Brian can explain why. Whether the WG actually does anything about it is between you and your AD. :-)
(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS!