IAB, IESG, and IAOC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees
RFC 7437
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
04 | (System) | Notify list changed from superuser@gmail.com, barryleiba@gmail.com to (None) |
|
2015-01-06
|
04 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2015-01-06
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc7437">AUTH48-DONE</a> from AUTH48 |
|
2014-12-23
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc7437">AUTH48</a> from RFC-EDITOR |
|
2014-12-18
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2014-11-26
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
|
2014-11-25
|
04 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup |
|
2014-11-25
|
04 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
|
2014-11-25
|
04 | Murray Kucherawy | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
|
2014-11-25
|
04 | Murray Kucherawy | New version available: draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-04.txt |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot comment] Abstaining because I don't really think that it's useful to publish "roll-up" documents like this. Section 1. "The meetings are referred to as … [Ballot comment] Abstaining because I don't really think that it's useful to publish "roll-up" documents like this. Section 1. "The meetings are referred to as the First IETF, Second IETF, or Third IETF as needed." It would be helpful to clarify that these are First, Second, and Third "of the year". Section 1. "The time frames specified here use IETF meetings as a frame of reference." I would like to not end up in a constitutional crisis if we decide to change the number or spacing of the meetings. Can we clarify here that if the assumptions made about IETF meetings change, then ... it's up to the NOMCOM chair to adjust the schedule? |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Richard Barnes has been changed to Abstain from Discuss |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot discuss] Section 3.7.1. "The IETF Executive Director" Holy process arcana, Batman! It took me a fair bit of digging to figure out that this … [Ballot discuss] Section 3.7.1. "The IETF Executive Director" Holy process arcana, Batman! It took me a fair bit of digging to figure out that this is a secret code for "the IAOC or their delegate" [RFC4071]. Please add a note in the terminology to say that this phrase is used only for convenience, and that the actual completion of these duties is the responsibility of the IAOC. |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot comment] Section 1. "The meetings are referred to as the First IETF, Second IETF, or Third IETF as needed." It would be helpful to … [Ballot comment] Section 1. "The meetings are referred to as the First IETF, Second IETF, or Third IETF as needed." It would be helpful to clarify that these are First, Second, and Third "of the year". Section 1. "The time frames specified here use IETF meetings as a frame of reference." I would like to not end up in a constitutional crisis if we decide to change the number or spacing of the meetings. Can we clarify here that if the assumptions made about IETF meetings change, then ... it's up to the NOMCOM chair to adjust the schedule? |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Richard Barnes | Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Richard Barnes |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] THANK YOU for doing this work, and particularly for keeping it to the compilation of changes rather than a shopping list of desirable … [Ballot comment] THANK YOU for doing this work, and particularly for keeping it to the compilation of changes rather than a shopping list of desirable tweaks :-) |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to Yes from No Objection |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot comment] This is a real improvement over the existing state of the art. I've dropped my previous discuss, which was the result of catching … [Ballot comment] This is a real improvement over the existing state of the art. I've dropped my previous discuss, which was the result of catching a nit in -02 that had already been fixed in -03. Thanks! |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot discuss] This is a real improvement over the existing state of the art--thanks for doing it. I have a question I'd like to discuss, … [Ballot discuss] This is a real improvement over the existing state of the art--thanks for doing it. I have a question I'd like to discuss, but I anticipate dropping the discuss quickly; I'm not sure whether the document needs updated or I just missed something. In section 4.3, the number of liaisons is changed (from 3777) from three to four. However, I don't see any change to the document that says who the fourth liaison is, and indeed the text only seems to mention three liaisons. What did I miss? |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] I have not seen a reply to Bert Wijnen's point: while reviewing I noticed this: - section 2: sitting member: A person … [Ballot comment] I have not seen a reply to Bert Wijnen's point: while reviewing I noticed this: - section 2: sitting member: A person who is currently serving a term of membership in the IESG, IAB, or ISOC Board of Trustees. Are you sure it is an ISOC Board of Trustees member? Or did you mean IAOC member. I think you did. The IETF NOMCOM has no say about ISOC Trustees as far as I know. Thanks for this work. Regards, Benoit |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Yes |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] Thanks for this work. Regards, Benoit |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
|
2014-11-25
|
03 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot discuss] Section 1. "The time frames specified here use IETF meetings as a frame of reference." I would like to not end up in … [Ballot discuss] Section 1. "The time frames specified here use IETF meetings as a frame of reference." I would like to not end up in a constitutional crisis if we decide to change the number or spacing of the meetings. Can we clarify here that if the assumptions made about IETF meetings change, then ... it's up to the NOMCOM chair to adjust the schedule? Section 3.7.1. "The IETF Executive Director" Holy process arcana, Batman! It took me a fair bit of digging to figure out that this is a secret code for "the IAOC or their delegate" [RFC4071]. Please add a note in the terminology to say that this phrase is used only for convenience, and that the actual completion of these duties is the responsibility of the IAOC. |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot comment] Section 1. "The meetings are referred to as the First IETF, Second IETF, or Third IETF as needed." It would be helpful to … [Ballot comment] Section 1. "The meetings are referred to as the First IETF, Second IETF, or Third IETF as needed." It would be helpful to clarify that these are First, Second, and Third "of the year". |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot comment] 3.1 and throughout - Probably useful to use the "seven (7)" convention when using numbers. |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] I only wish "Heck, yes" was a defined ballot position. I've been reading through various versions of this draft since -00, and believe … [Ballot comment] I only wish "Heck, yes" was a defined ballot position. I've been reading through various versions of this draft since -00, and believe -03 does a good job of folding in post-RFC 3777 updates without introducing changes to the Nomcom process, as the author was asked to do. Thanks for doing it. |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
|
2014-11-24
|
03 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
|
2014-11-23
|
03 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] The document updates are very helpful, thanks for your work on this draft. My only comment is from personal experience, possibly for appendix … [Ballot comment] The document updates are very helpful, thanks for your work on this draft. My only comment is from personal experience, possibly for appendix C. It is not cut-and-dry timeline information, but rather more anecdotal information passed from experience (in the intent of the appendix, but this particular appendix is not written that way). I believe last year's process ran a little late (I could be wrong), but in any case, the time line was tight to wrap up my work at EMC. I had hoped to take a week off in between, but was not able to do that as the transition work began very quickly. It might be good to ensure folks have time as you are often getting senior level candidates who lead big projects that have to be wrapped up and some time off in between could be very beneficial. Perhaps a reminder of those considerations would be helpful. |
|
2014-11-23
|
03 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
|
2014-11-22
|
03 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was changed |
|
2014-11-22
|
03 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] I think it is really helpful to have this compilation available for future NomComs and to act as a foundation for any changes … [Ballot comment] I think it is really helpful to have this compilation available for future NomComs and to act as a foundation for any changes we want to make. Thanks for making it. Any time you want to spell my name right you can go right ahead and do it. |
|
2014-11-22
|
03 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
|
2014-11-21
|
03 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
|
2014-11-19
|
03 | Barry Leiba | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
|
2014-11-19
|
03 | Barry Leiba | Ballot has been issued |
|
2014-11-19
|
03 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
|
2014-11-19
|
03 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2014-11-19
|
03 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
|
2014-11-18
|
03 | Christer Holmberg | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Christer Holmberg. |
|
2014-11-18
|
03 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
|
2014-11-14
|
03 | Murray Kucherawy | New version available: draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-03.txt |
|
2014-11-13
|
02 | Murray Kucherawy | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
|
2014-11-13
|
02 | Murray Kucherawy | New version available: draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-02.txt |
|
2014-10-30
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Warren Kumari. |
|
2014-10-30
|
01 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Bert Wijnen. |
|
2014-10-28
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-11-25 |
|
2014-10-28
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was changed |
|
2014-10-27
|
01 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
|
2014-10-27
|
01 | Pearl Liang | IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-01, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that, upon approval of this … IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-01, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions that need completion. While it is helpful for the IANA Considerations section of the document to remain in place upon publication, if the authors prefer to remove it, IANA doesn't object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. |
|
2014-10-24
|
01 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Bert Wijnen |
|
2014-10-24
|
01 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Bert Wijnen |
|
2014-10-23
|
01 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg |
|
2014-10-23
|
01 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg |
|
2014-10-23
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari |
|
2014-10-23
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | The following Last Call announcement was sent out:<br><br>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Subject: … The following Last Call announcement was sent out:<br><br>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Subject: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-01.txt> (IAB, IESG, and IAOC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees) to Best Current Practice The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'IAB, IESG, and IAOC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees' <draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-01.txt> as Best Current Practice The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-11-18. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The process by which the members of the IAB and IESG, and some members of the IAOC, are selected, confirmed, and recalled is specified in this document. This document is a self-consistent, organized compilation of the process as it was known at the time of publication of [RFC3777], with various updates since that version was published. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Last call was requested |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Last call announcement was generated |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Ballot approval text was generated |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was generated |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Assigned to General Area |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Changed document writeup |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Notification list changed to "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@gmail.com> |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Document shepherd changed to Barry Leiba |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Intended Status changed to Best Current Practice from None |
|
2014-10-21
|
01 | Barry Leiba | Stream changed to IETF from None |
|
2014-09-15
|
01 | Murray Kucherawy | New version available: draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-01.txt |
|
2014-09-03
|
00 | Murray Kucherawy | New version available: draft-kucherawy-rfc3777bis-00.txt |