Analysis of Failure Cases in IPv6 Roaming Scenarios
RFC 7445

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -05)
No email
send info

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-10-16 for -06)
No email
send info
Given the content of the document as indicated by the Abstract, it
would be really helpful if the document title also included "failure."
Something like "Analysis of Failure Cases in IPv6 Roaming Scenarios"

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-10-15 for -06)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review questions.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05126.html

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-10-15 for -06)
No email
send info
It seems a bit odd to publish this in the IETF instead of 3GPP or the like, but presuming we're not stepping on any toes and the WG thought this was good information to put out there, I don't see any reason to object.

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info