Monitoring and Control MIB for Power and Energy
RFC 7460
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(Joel Jaeggli) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
Comment (2014-07-08 for -12)
No email
send info
send info
former discuss, we processed this. -12 should soon be forthcoming to address the accidental inclusion of eoPowerStorageType StorageType in draft 11 which was merged from a previous draft.
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Alia Atlas) No Objection
(Richard Barnes) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2014-12-01)
No email
send info
send info
Thanks for addressing my comments.
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2014-12-01)
No email
send info
send info
Thanks for adding the new privacy boilerplate. I guess I'd be happier if the privacy issues with power monitoring were more to the fore, but at least recognising the issues is a start and my preference in that regard aren't a good basis on which to block progress.
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
Comment (2014-07-09 for -12)
No email
send info
send info
I support the issues raised by Alissa and Kathleen.
(Barry Leiba) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection
Comment (2014-11-30)
No email
send info
send info
Thank you for adding in text on privacy considerations as well as strengthening the language on the possibility of attacks to motivate use of SNMPv3 with associated security controls.