Skip to main content

An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)
RFC 7466

Yes


No Objection

(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2014-11-03 for -03)
A minor nit that needs attention is to indicate clearly in the Abstract that the protocol extension in this document is optional.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-11-24 for -03)
= Section 3 =
"This specification also updates [RFC7181].  This could be avoided by
   simply noting that ..."

This doesn't quite make sense. Maybe it should say "This could have been avoided"? Or maybe this paragraph is really about the mechanism as opposed to the spec updating 7181? I thought the way this was explained in Section 1 was sufficient and made sense.

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2014-11-03 for -03)
No objection, and no comments directly on the document -- it looks fine, clear, and sensible.

The shepherd writeup momentarily alarmed me with this:

        There were some concerns regarding a missing
        quantitative evaluation of the performance improvement of the
        specified optimization from Abdussalam Baryun. Nobody else shared 
        his concerns, and he can therefore be considered to be "in the rough".

One is not in the rough just because no one shares his concern: if he has a technical argument that has not been properly addressed, it matters not that he's a lone wolf howling... the argument remains open.

So I went to the manet mailing list and checked, and I'm convinced that it is *not* the case that he's a lone wolf.  I believe his issue was addressed, that he is, indeed, in the rough, and that I was alarmed unnecessarily.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)

                            

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -03)