Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement and Requirements
RFC 7497

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from ietf@wjcerveny.com, ippm-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2015-04-06
10 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Telechat review by GENART with state 'No Response'
2015-04-06
10 (System) RFC published
2015-04-02
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2015-03-26
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2015-03-23
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2015-02-17
10 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Dan Romascanu.
2015-02-13
10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2015-02-12
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2015-02-12
10 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2015-02-12
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2015-02-12
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2015-02-12
10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup
2015-02-12
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2015-02-12
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2015-02-12
10 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2015-02-12
10 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2015-02-12
10 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2015-02-05
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2015-02-05
10 Al Morton IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2015-02-05
10 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-10.txt
2015-02-05
09 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2015-02-05
09 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2015-02-05
09 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2015-02-05
09 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
- Thanks for the "Operational Considerations" new section, as discussed with D. Romascanu

- The document tile says problem statement, but it's a ...
2015-02-05
09 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2015-02-04
09 Spencer Dawkins IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup
2015-02-04
09 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2015-02-04
09 Kathleen Moriarty
[Ballot comment]
I'll follow along on Stephen's comments and don't have any others to add.  The draft is well-written, thank you for your work on ...
2015-02-04
09 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2015-02-04
09 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2015-02-04
09 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I agree with Stephen's observations about the use of 2119 keywords in this type of document.
2015-02-04
09 Brian Haberman Ballot comment text updated for Brian Haberman
2015-02-04
09 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2015-02-04
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- I'm not clear why it's a good plan for this document to
state a bunch of MUST level requirements on protocol
specifications, ...
2015-02-04
09 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2015-02-03
09 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2015-02-03
09 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2015-02-01
09 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document, but I did
have one observation:

Although section 2 has discussion of the ...
2015-02-01
09 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2015-01-30
09 Bill Cerveny
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet
Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper
type of RFC? ...
2015-01-28
09 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2015-01-28
09 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2015-01-27
09 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2015-01-26
09 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2015-01-26
09 Spencer Dawkins Ballot has been issued
2015-01-26
09 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2015-01-26
09 Spencer Dawkins Created "Approve" ballot
2015-01-26
09 Spencer Dawkins Ballot writeup was changed
2015-01-20
09 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2015-01-20
09 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2015-01-16
09 Spencer Dawkins Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-02-05
2015-01-16
09 Spencer Dawkins Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2015-01-09
09 Al Morton IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2015-01-09
09 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-09.txt
2014-12-22
08 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2014-12-17
08 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Dan Romascanu.
2014-12-15
08 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2014-12-15
08 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2014-12-11
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2014-12-11
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2014-12-11
08 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dorothy Gellert
2014-12-11
08 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dorothy Gellert
2014-12-10
08 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2014-12-08
08 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2014-12-08
08 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <ippm@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> ...
2014-12-08
08 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2014-12-08
08 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2014-12-06
08 Spencer Dawkins Last call was requested
2014-12-06
08 Spencer Dawkins Last call announcement was generated
2014-12-06
08 Spencer Dawkins Ballot approval text was generated
2014-12-06
08 Spencer Dawkins Ballot writeup was generated
2014-12-06
08 Spencer Dawkins IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2014-12-06
08 Spencer Dawkins IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2014-11-24
08 Brian Trammell Tag Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG cleared.
2014-11-24
08 Brian Trammell IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2014-11-24
08 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt
2014-11-17
07 Brian Trammell New revision needed to address those WGLC comments not related to asymmetric packet size configuration.
2014-11-17
07 Brian Trammell Tag Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG set.
2014-11-17
07 Brian Trammell IETF WG state changed to WG Document from Submitted to IESG for Publication
2014-11-11
07 Bill Cerveny
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet
Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper
type of RFC? ...
2014-11-11
07 Bill Cerveny State Change Notice email list changed to ietf@wjcerveny.com, draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem.all@tools.ietf.org, ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org
2014-11-11
07 Bill Cerveny Responsible AD changed to Spencer Dawkins
2014-11-11
07 Bill Cerveny IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from In WG Last Call
2014-11-11
07 Bill Cerveny IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2014-11-11
07 Bill Cerveny IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2014-11-11
07 Bill Cerveny Changed document writeup
2014-10-07
07 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-07.txt
2014-08-07
06 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-06.txt
2014-06-04
05 Brian Trammell IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2014-01-24
05 Brian Trammell Intended Status changed to Informational from None
2013-12-12
05 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05.txt
2013-09-19
04 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-04.txt
2013-07-11
03 Bill Cerveny Document shepherd changed to Bill Cerveny
2013-04-23
03 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-03.txt
2013-02-01
02 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-02.txt
2012-12-21
01 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-01.txt
2012-06-30
00 Al Morton New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-00.txt