Methodology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic Session Setup and Registration
RFC 7502
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
= Section 4.1 =
"It is best
; off to start with the defaults (w = 0.10 and
; r >= 10)"
I thought the default was r = 100?
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
I trust the shepherding AD and his review of this document.
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
Since this is a set of benchmarks for use in a lab environment, I agree with the security considerations section statement that there are no considerations when used in the way described. Thanks.
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection
It seems like it might be worth noting for the media-on-DUT cases that the degree of SIP performance degradation due to media might differ depending on factors like what the DUT does with the media (e.g., relaying vs. transcoding), the type of media (audio vs. video vs. data), and the codec used for the media. There may also be cases where there is no performance impact, if the DUT has dedicated media-path hardware.