Skip to main content

Encapsulating MPLS in UDP
RFC 7510

Yes


No Objection

(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Pete Resnick)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)

Recuse

(Adrian Farrel)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

Yes (2015-01-21 for -10)
Thanks for clarifying my concerns that we aren't missing a case of upstream-assigned labels in a unicast tunnel.  We only really need upstream-assigned labels if the tunnel itself is multi-access.

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2015-01-21 for -10)
Thanks to all involved for working through the issues with congestion and zero checksums. I'm happy to ballot Yes on this version (while watching Martin's Discuss out of the corner of my eye).

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2015-01-22 for -10)
- An editorial detail in the abstract. Take it or leave it
   The MPLS-in-UDP encapsulation technology must only be deployed within a
   single network (with a single network operator) or networks of an
   adjacent set of co-operating network operators where traffic is
   managed to avoid congestion, rather than over the Internet where
   congestion control is required.

We rarely see specifications ("must" sentences) in abstracts.
Do you want to say something like: 
   The MPLS-in-UDP encapsulation applicability is for networks where 
   traffic is managed to avoid congestion, rather than over the Internet 
   where congestion control is required.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2015-01-21 for -10)
Thank you for the extensive discussion of the UDP zero checksum over IPv6 issue.

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2015-02-02)
Thank you for addressing my concern.

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse

Recuse (for -10)