Encapsulating MPLS in UDP
RFC 7510
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
Thanks for clarifying my concerns that we aren't missing a case of upstream-assigned labels in a unicast tunnel. We only really need upstream-assigned labels if the tunnel itself is multi-access.
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes
Thanks to all involved for working through the issues with congestion and zero checksums. I'm happy to ballot Yes on this version (while watching Martin's Discuss out of the corner of my eye).
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
- An editorial detail in the abstract. Take it or leave it
The MPLS-in-UDP encapsulation technology must only be deployed within a
single network (with a single network operator) or networks of an
adjacent set of co-operating network operators where traffic is
managed to avoid congestion, rather than over the Internet where
congestion control is required.
We rarely see specifications ("must" sentences) in abstracts.
Do you want to say something like:
The MPLS-in-UDP encapsulation applicability is for networks where
traffic is managed to avoid congestion, rather than over the Internet
where congestion control is required.
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
Thank you for the extensive discussion of the UDP zero checksum over IPv6 issue.
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04303.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05318.html
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you for addressing my concern.
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse