Encapsulating MPLS in UDP
RFC 7510
Yes
No Objection
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Pete Resnick)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)
Recuse
(Adrian Farrel)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
(2015-01-21 for -10)
Thanks for clarifying my concerns that we aren't missing a case of upstream-assigned labels in a unicast tunnel. We only really need upstream-assigned labels if the tunnel itself is multi-access.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2015-01-21 for -10)
Thanks to all involved for working through the issues with congestion and zero checksums. I'm happy to ballot Yes on this version (while watching Martin's Discuss out of the corner of my eye).
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-01-22 for -10)
- An editorial detail in the abstract. Take it or leave it
The MPLS-in-UDP encapsulation technology must only be deployed within a
single network (with a single network operator) or networks of an
adjacent set of co-operating network operators where traffic is
managed to avoid congestion, rather than over the Internet where
congestion control is required.
We rarely see specifications ("must" sentences) in abstracts.
Do you want to say something like:
The MPLS-in-UDP encapsulation applicability is for networks where
traffic is managed to avoid congestion, rather than over the Internet
where congestion control is required.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-01-21 for -10)
Thank you for the extensive discussion of the UDP zero checksum over IPv6 issue.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-01-21 for -10)
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04303.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05318.html
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-02-02)
Thank you for addressing my concern.
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
(for -10)