The Network Access Identifier
RFC 7542

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-08-16 15 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Errata tag)
2015-10-14 15 (System) Notify list changed from radext-chairs@ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu to (None)
2015-05-07 15 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Telechat review by GENART with state 'No Response'
2015-05-01 15 (System) RFC published
2015-04-29 15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2015-04-27 15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2015-04-02 15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from AUTH
2015-03-26 15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH from EDIT
2015-02-09 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2015-02-09 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2015-02-09 15 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2015-02-09 15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2015-02-09 15 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2015-02-09 15 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2015-02-09 15 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2015-02-09 15 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2015-02-09 15 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2015-02-09 15 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2015-02-09 15 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2015-01-23 15 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
As far as I can see, and based on my attempt to find people who would still have an issue, we have cleared ...
2015-01-23 15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-12-17 15 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-15.txt
2014-12-11 14 Benoit Claise
Notification list changed to radext@ietf.org, draft-ietf-radext-nai.all@tools.ietf.org, radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu from radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org ...
2014-12-04 14 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation
2014-12-04 14 Alissa Cooper [Ballot comment]
Thanks for all your efforts on this document.
2014-12-04 14 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alissa Cooper has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-12-04 14 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing all of my comments.
2014-12-04 14 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-12-04 14 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-14.txt
2014-12-04 13 Alan DeKok IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2014-12-04 13 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-13.txt
2014-12-04 12 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Mehmet Ersue.
2014-12-04 12 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for writing this document. It was and is badly needed, and
as noted, roaming, network access authentication, and the use of
NAIs ...
2014-12-04 12 Jari Arkko Ballot discuss text updated for Jari Arkko
2014-12-04 12 Kathleen Moriarty
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for including an explanation of what is intended by inter-domain authentication per my previous discuss point.  I think this will ...
2014-12-04 12 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] Position for Kathleen Moriarty has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-12-04 12 Ted Lemon [Ballot comment]
I support the changes Alissa has proposed to address the privacy concerns she raised.
2014-12-04 12 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2014-12-04 12 Benoit Claise
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2014-12-04 12 Benoit Claise
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2014-12-04 12 Benoit Claise
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2014-12-04 12 Benoit Claise
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2014-12-04 12 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for writing this document. It was and is badly needed, and
as noted, roaming, network access authentication, and the use of
NAIs ...
2014-12-04 12 Jari Arkko Ballot discuss text updated for Jari Arkko
2014-12-04 12 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for writing this document. It was and is badly needed, and
as noted, roaming, network access authentication, and the use of
NAIs ...
2014-12-04 12 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]

Section 1.4:

  * [RFC4282] Section 2.4 required mappings that are
      language-specific, and which are nearly impossible for
  ...
2014-12-04 12 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2014-12-04 12 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2014-12-03 12 Joel Jaeggli
[Ballot comment]
imho I think the hope statements are ok. and I can live with draft 12
------
opsdir review of 11 (by Mehmet Ersue) for ...
2014-12-03 12 Joel Jaeggli Ballot comment text updated for Joel Jaeggli
2014-12-03 12 Joel Jaeggli
[Ballot comment]
opsdir review of 11 for the record.

I have reviewed the document "The Network Access Identifier" (draft-ietf-radext-nai-11.txt) as part of the Operational ...
2014-12-03 12 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2014-12-03 12 Amanda Baber IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2014-12-03 12 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
1.4:

OLD
  The intent
  appears to have been to encode, compare, and transport realms with
  the ToASCII operation defined ...
2014-12-03 12 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Throughout (and this is the second document this week): I always find the "we" language jarring. "We" in this case is the WG ...
2014-12-03 12 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2014-12-03 12 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2014-12-03 12 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2014-12-03 12 Alia Atlas [Ballot comment]
I support Alissa's concerns on privacy.
2014-12-03 12 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2014-12-03 12 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my comments in version -12.

-- Sections 2.6 and 2.6.1 --
Good work on these sections.  This is ...
2014-12-03 12 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-12-03 12 Alan DeKok IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2014-12-03 12 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-12.txt
2014-12-03 11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- This is not a blocking DISCUSS as it may be a feature
request but I'd really like to chat about it. In ...
2014-12-03 11 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2014-12-02 11 Kathleen Moriarty
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for your work on this draft and helpful responses to other discusses.  I just have one item I'd like to ...
2014-12-02 11 Kathleen Moriarty
[Ballot comment]
I support Barry's discuss on privacy concerns and appreciate the text you provided to address this concern. 

The following is just ...
2014-12-02 11 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2014-12-02 11 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot discuss]
= General =

This document seems to confuse an identifier format with an identifier, and I'd like to discuss that.

In my reading, all ...
2014-12-02 11 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot comment]
= Section 1 =
Is dial-up really a prevalent use case to be highlighting first here? If we're going to obsolete an old document ...
2014-12-02 11 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2014-12-01 11 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
A significant thing that's new in this document is that you're recommending the use of a common identifier across different services ...
2014-12-01 11 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
There's quite some duplication between the new text in Section 1 and the new text in Section 1.3.  You might ...
2014-12-01 11 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2014-12-01 11 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
I have no problem with the publication of this document, but I do have a few points for you to consider.

1. The ...
2014-12-01 11 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2014-11-28 11 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2014-11-26 11 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2014-11-26 11 Alan DeKok IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2014-11-26 11 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-11.txt
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-12-04
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise Ballot has been issued
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise Created "Approve" ballot
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise Ballot writeup was changed
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2014-11-26 10 Benoit Claise IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from Waiting for Writeup
2014-11-20 10 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Yoav Nir.
2014-11-14 10 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2014-11-11 10 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Mehmet Ersue
2014-11-07 10 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2014-11-07 10 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-radext-nai-10, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that, upon approval of ...
2014-11-06 10 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2014-11-06 10 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Yoav Nir
2014-10-31 10 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2014-10-31 10 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
CC:
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (The Network ...
2014-10-31 10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2014-10-31 10 Benoit Claise Last call was requested
2014-10-31 10 Benoit Claise Last call announcement was generated
2014-10-31 10 Benoit Claise Ballot approval text was generated
2014-10-31 10 Benoit Claise Ballot writeup was generated
2014-10-31 10 Benoit Claise IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2014-10-30 10 Naveen Khan New revision available
2014-10-29 09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2014-10-29 09 Naveen Khan New revision available
2014-10-28 08 Benoit Claise IESG state changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from AD Evaluation
2014-10-28 08 Benoit Claise IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter State Change Notice email list changed to radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter Responsible AD changed to Benoit Claise
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter Changed document writeup
2014-10-09 08 Stefan Winter Changed document writeup
2014-09-24 08 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-08.txt
2014-09-23 07 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-07.txt
2014-06-17 06 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-06.txt
2014-03-25 05 Stefan Winter Document shepherd changed to Stefan Winter
2014-03-17 05 Jouni Korhonen Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2014-03-17 05 Jouni Korhonen Document shepherd changed to Mauricio Sanchez
2014-02-20 05 Jouni Korhonen
Will do the proto after IETF.

Feb 19th from Alan:

Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> OK, I was waiting since you said you would have a ...
2014-02-20 05 Jouni Korhonen Tag Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC cleared.
2014-02-20 05 Jouni Korhonen IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2013-11-06 05 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05.txt
2013-10-17 04 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-04.txt
2013-06-18 03 Jouni Korhonen Annotation tag Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC set.
2013-06-03 03 Jouni Korhonen IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2013-06-03 03 Jouni Korhonen Annotation tag Other - see Comment Log set.
2013-05-23 03 Jouni Korhonen
The WGLC#1 has ended. There are now five open tickets in the issue tracker (#162, #145, #146, #164 and #167). I encourage the I-D ...
2013-05-23 03 Jouni Korhonen WGLC #1 - ends 18th June 2013
draft-ietf-radext-nai-03
2013-05-23 03 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-03.txt
2013-01-28 02 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-02.txt
2013-01-08 01 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-01.txt
2013-01-02 00 Alan DeKok New version available: draft-ietf-radext-nai-00.txt