A Widely Deployed Solution to the Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) Fragmentation Problem
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
(Alia Atlas) Yes
(Brian Haberman) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
Deborah Brungard No Objection
(Ben Campbell) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
Comment (2015-05-14 for -04)
I agree that adding a para in response to Kathleen's discuss is a good plan.
(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection
Comment (2015-05-09 for -04)
from Tom Taylor's opsdir review (looks like it's being addressed already) My apologies -- I let this slip way past due date. This is a review of operational aspects of this document, primarily for use by the OPS area ADs in their evaluation of the document. Summary: this document describes a commonly encountered set of implemented procedures for handling fragmentation of GRE packets. The described procedures include configuration options. The document is well-written and ready to go subject to the following observations, all of which are trivial except for the second minor issue noted below. Tom Taylor 1) Very minor issue: there is no advice to the operator on coordinating the configuration of the ingress and egress nodes. Section 3.3.2 assumes that configuration is coordinated (i.e., fragmented GRE delivery packets are reassembled at egress). Section 3.4 simply presents the option. This could be fixed by changing the relevant sentence of 126.96.36.199 and 188.8.131.52 as follows: OLD If the delivery packet is fragmented, it is reassembled by the GRE egress. NEW If the delivery packet is fragmented, it is reassembled by the GRE egress if the latter is configured to do so. 2) Minor issue: 184.108.40.206, 220.127.116.11, 18.104.22.168 final paragraph: s/delivery header/delivery packet/ Typos: Last paragraph before Sec. 3, second line: s/lager/larger/ 22.214.171.124 second paragraph, last line on page 5: s/an Next-hop MTU/a Next-Hop MTU value/ 126.96.36.199 first line: s/send/sends/ Sec. 5 last paragraph, fourth last line: s/includes/include/ _______________________________________________ OPS-DIR mailing list OPS-DIR@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir
Barry Leiba No Objection
(Terry Manderson) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you for adding text on fragmentation attacks.