DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and Port-Mapped Clients
RFC 7598

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Ted Lemon) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-30 for -09)
No email
send info
This issue has been discussed and the authors have proposed changes to the references. I will leave the authors and AD to resolve the issue.

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-14 for -09)
No email
send info
* I am surprised that some of the option formats do not do a better job of aligning fields on 32-bit boundaries.  Re-arranging a few fields (and possibly adding a Reserved/Padding field) would make parsing easier for the S46 Rule Option and the S46 DMR Option.

* I will note that since each of these options provides a single IP address, there is no mechanism in place to handle a failure with service hosted at that IP address.  For example, what would a client do if the address signaled via the OPTION_S46_BR was no longer reachable?

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

Comment (2014-10-29 for -09)
No email
send info
I've had a quick look, and nothing stands out.  I trust my distinguished colleague from Vermont from there.

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection