Skip to main content

Explicit Subscriptions for the REFER Method
RFC 7614

Yes

(Ben Campbell)

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana
No Objection
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -02)

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2015-06-22 for -02)
I'm a Yes, and this specification was mostly clear, but one sentence in the text was hard for me to parse:

   If it is important that the UA
   be able to subscribe to any refer state generated by accepting this
   request, the request needs to be formed to limit the number of places
   that it will be accepted to one.
   
Is there a phrasing that's not passive English, says directly who is responsible for doing this, and uses "one" as an adjective?

For example, would be be correct to say:

   If it is important that the UA
   be able to subscribe to any refer state generated by accepting this
   request, the UA needs to form the request so that it will obly be 
   accepted in one place.
   
?
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2015-06-24 for -02)
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review comments.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=secdir
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02)