Skip to main content

Flow-Binding Support for Mobile IP
RFC 7629

Yes

(Brian Haberman)

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
(Alia Atlas)
(Ben Campbell)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana
No Objection
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -12)

                            
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12)

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2015-06-19 for -12)
Thanks for addressing all my comments, and so sorry for the error in my DISCUSS.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12)

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2015-06-09 for -12)
As mentioned by Jürgen Schönwälder in his OPS-DIR review:
I see no problem with publishing this I-D as Experimental RFCs hence
give it a 'Ready'. That said, it would have been nice if the document
would indicate whether the extension impacts any of the MIB modules,
namely the MIP-MIB [RFC2006] and the MOBILEIPV6-MIB [RFC4295]. It
could be that the MIB tables simply work for multiple registrations
over multiple interfaces. Anyway, since this I-D is submitted for
publication as Experimental, I do not consider this necessary to
address at this point in time (just nice to have).
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12)

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12)

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12)

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2015-06-10 for -12)
Are there privacy considerations that need to be added since a mobile users data may go through multiple tunnels?  Perhaps this diffuses the traceability of that user since multiple tunnels are used or it reveals patterns the mobile user may have as different tunnels are selected.  If these are not concerns, can you explain why?  Thanks.
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12)