A One-Way Loss Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
RFC 7680

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2015-08-18 for -04)
No email
send info
Just reviewing the changes:

2.8.1:

s/in future/future

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Comment (2015-08-18 for -04)
No email
send info
Same comment I had on the security considerations section in draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis. I don't think it's quite accurate to say "there can be no release of existing user data."

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Comment (2015-08-14 for -04)
No email
send info
No issues from my perspective given I only reviewed the changes (diff is a wonderful thing) between this draft and RFC 2680.

Barry Leiba No Objection

Comment (2015-08-19 for -04)
No email
send info
Nice to see us moving documents to Internet Standard when it's appropriate.

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2015-08-20)
No email
send info
Thanks for adding in additional security considerations on reconnaissance.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection