DNS Transport over TCP - Implementation Requirements
RFC 7766

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2019-03-16
06 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (created updates relation between draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis and RFC 8490)
2016-03-03
06 (System) RFC published
2016-02-29
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2016-02-25
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2016-02-25
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2016-01-18
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2016-01-18
06 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2016-01-18
06 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2016-01-15
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2016-01-15
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2016-01-15
06 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup
2016-01-15
06 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2016-01-15
06 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2016-01-15
06 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2016-01-15
06 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup was changed
2016-01-15
06 Joel Jaeggli IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2016-01-15
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot comment]

Thanks for addressing my issue about TFO & DPRIVE.
2016-01-15
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2016-01-15
06 Sara Dickinson IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2016-01-15
06 Sara Dickinson New version available: draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-06.txt
2016-01-14
05 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2016-01-13
05 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alvaro Retana has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2016-01-13
05 Tim Wicinski Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from Internet Standard
2016-01-07
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation
2016-01-07
05 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
In this text:

  It is however noted that certain primary/secondary
  configurations with many busy zones might need to use more ...
2016-01-07
05 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2016-01-07
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2016-01-06
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

Don't we need text warning that TFO is likely problematic
with DNS privacy and that attacks that try to prepend
information (via ...
2016-01-06
05 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2016-01-06
05 Ben Campbell
[Ballot comment]
I'm balloting "yes" under the assumption this is intended as proposed standard.

6.2.1.1:
Now that clients SHOULD pipeline, is ...
2016-01-06
05 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2016-01-06
05 Alvaro Retana
[Ballot discuss]
I don’t have concerns over the technical content of this document, but I do have want to raise a process-related DISCUSS.

The ...
2016-01-06
05 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2016-01-06
05 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2016-01-06
05 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
While I am not a fan of standards-track requirements documents, I understand the history of 5966 and support the publication of this document ...
2016-01-06
05 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2016-01-06
05 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
I was slightly surprised by "implementation requirements" in the title.
If we write a RFC, we hopefully hope/require future implementations, right?
I ...
2016-01-06
05 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2016-01-06
05 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
-- Section 5 --

  This requirement is hereby relaxed.  Stub resolvers and recursive
  resolvers MAY elect to send either TCP or UDP ...
2016-01-06
05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2016-01-05
05 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
One comment and request for clarification:

In the first paragraph of Section 8:
"  DNS clients and servers SHOULD pass the two-octet length ...
2016-01-05
05 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2016-01-05
05 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2015-12-31
05 Brian Carpenter Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Brian Carpenter.
2015-12-31
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Brian Carpenter
2015-12-31
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Brian Carpenter
2015-12-29
05 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2015-12-21
05 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2015-12-20
05 Joel Jaeggli Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-01-07
2015-12-20
05 Joel Jaeggli IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup
2015-12-20
05 Joel Jaeggli Ballot has been issued
2015-12-20
05 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2015-12-20
05 Joel Jaeggli Created "Approve" ballot
2015-12-20
05 Joel Jaeggli Ballot writeup was changed
2015-12-20
05 Joel Jaeggli Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2015-12-17
05 Sara Dickinson IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2015-12-17
05 Sara Dickinson New version available: draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05.txt
2015-12-07
04 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2015-12-04
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Rick Casarez.
2015-11-30
04 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2015-11-30
04 Sabrina Tanamal
(Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-04.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We ...
2015-11-30
04 Brian Carpenter Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Almost Ready. Reviewer: Brian Carpenter.
2015-11-29
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Rick Casarez
2015-11-29
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Rick Casarez
2015-11-26
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Christopher Inacio
2015-11-26
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Christopher Inacio
2015-11-23
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Brian Carpenter
2015-11-23
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Brian Carpenter
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, joelja ...
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2015-11-23
04 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2015-11-22
04 Joel Jaeggli Last call was requested
2015-11-22
04 Joel Jaeggli Last call announcement was generated
2015-11-22
04 Joel Jaeggli Ballot approval text was generated
2015-11-22
04 Joel Jaeggli Ballot writeup was generated
2015-11-22
04 Joel Jaeggli IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2015-11-05
04 Joel Jaeggli IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2015-11-02
04 Sara Dickinson New version available: draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-04.txt
2015-11-01
03 Tim Wicinski
1. Summary

Document Shepherd:  Tim Wicinski
Area Director:      Joel Jaggeli

Document Type:      Standards Track
Obsoletes:      ...
2015-11-01
03 Tim Wicinski Responsible AD changed to Joel Jaeggli
2015-11-01
03 Tim Wicinski IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2015-11-01
03 Tim Wicinski IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2015-11-01
03 Tim Wicinski IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2015-11-01
03 Tim Wicinski Changed document writeup
2015-10-27
03 Tim Wicinski IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2015-10-14
03 (System) Notify list changed from "Tim Wicinski" <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> to (None)
2015-10-09
03 Tim Wicinski Notification list changed to "Tim Wicinski" <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
2015-10-09
03 Tim Wicinski Document shepherd changed to Tim Wicinski
2015-10-09
03 Tim Wicinski IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2015-09-20
03 Sara Dickinson New version available: draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-03.txt
2015-07-06
02 John Dickinson New version available: draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-02.txt
2015-06-26
01 Tim Wicinski Intended Status changed to Internet Standard from None
2015-04-20
01 Suzanne Woolf WG document.
2015-04-20
01 Suzanne Woolf This document now replaces draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis instead of None
2015-03-09
01 John Dickinson New version available: draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-01.txt
2014-12-04
00 John Dickinson New version available: draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-00.txt