Skip to main content

Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements
RFC 7772

Yes

(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Spencer Dawkins)

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
(Alia Atlas)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2015-11-17)
Just a few minor comments:

- 1: It would be nice to have a very brief summary of the recommendations (even if it's just the fact that the doc makes recommendations) in the introduction.

- 4, 3rd paragraph from end:"the average power budget for
      receiving RAs must be no more than 0.1mA"
Should that be mAH?

-8: There is no reference for RFC 6104.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -02)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2015-11-17)
I'd also like to see a response to the points int he SecDir review, Stephen provided the link already.

Thanks for your work on this draft.

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2015-11-16)
I like this kind of thing, thanks!

Is the implication of 5.1, bullet 1 that devices are listening
but check the RA information before deciding to wake the main
CPU or not? I'd say a reference to some description of that
kind of implementation would be a useful thing to add.

It'd be good to see a response to the secdir review, [1] which
raised a couple of minor points. 

   [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06122.html

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2015-11-17)
Some editorial proposals from Qin, part of the OPS Directorate review.
Here are a few suggestion and editorial comments:

1.  Section 4, last bullet:

s/ non-general-purpose/ dedicated

2.  Section 5.1, bullet 2 said:

“Administrators of networks that serve large numbers (tens or
hundreds) of battery-powered devices SHOULD enable this
behaviour.”

which behavior should be enabled? “Responding to Router Solicitations
with unicast Router Advertisements” or the behavior described by bullet 1?
Please make this clear.

3.  Section 5.1, bullet 3:

The word “Section” repeats twice, it is not necessary.
s/see section Section 4/see Section 4

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2015-11-17)
One comment about Section 4.  Router Advertisement frequency:

There are no references to where the power draw numbers are coming from. E.g., it is not clear what real device is taking 5 mA vs 200 mA.

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()