Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Deborah Brungard) No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

3.2.3, 2nd paragraph: "...OWAMP/TWAMP layer SHOULD treat the
   Checksum Complement as part of the Packet Padding."

The previous paragraph said this put no new requirements on the receiver. Is the SHOULD here a new requirement, or a statement of fact? (If the latter, it should not use the 2119 keyword.)

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper) (was Discuss) No Objection

Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS point.

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

This document lacks sufficient justification for why the checksum trailer is needed. I would suggest a brief description of when this approach is needed.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Al morton did the ops dir review.

(Barry Leiba) No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection