Privacy Considerations for DHCPv6
RFC 7824
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes
-2: If this is strictly an analysis with no proposed solution, why does it need 2119 keywords? Actually, I only found one MAY, and that seemed more a statement of fact than a new requirement. -5.6: This seems to talk about pervasive monitoring in a very general sense. Can you say something about how that specifically relates to dhcpv6?
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) Yes
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) Yes
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes
More thanks for this work. Most of my comments ended up being about the client profile for now. - DHCPv6: is there really nothing to say about link local addresses? (I'm not sure how those are used in DHCPv6, if they are, but they do often contain MACs.)
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection