Skip to main content

Updates to Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements
RFC 7857

Yes

(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -07)

                            

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -07)

                            

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -07)

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -07)

                            

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-03-01 for -07)
Some very minor comments:

- I echo Stephen's thanks to the shepherd for the details on the handling of the IPR disclosure.

- 14, third paragraph:
Please consider changing the "MUST...only" construction to either "MAY...only" or "MUST NOT...unless". I personally prefer the latter.  (OTOH, isn't this already covered normatively in section 3? Perhaps it could be descriptive here.)

-- Third paragraph from end:
s/"Hosts which require..."/"Hosts that require..."

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -07)

                            

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -07)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -07)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-03-01 for -07)
- Thanks for the info about the IPR declaration in the write
up. It's useful to know that. 

- intro: Phrases like "greatly advanced" always make me think
I'm getting sales talk and make me wonder why. (In this case,
there was no other sales talk though, and thanks for that:-)
I think s/greatly advanced/documented/ would have been fine.

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -07)