Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Security Version 3
RFC 7861
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes
Thanks for clearing up the sentences discussed in the SecDir review in your next version: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06302.html
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
I have the same question as Ben does about rp_name: nothing is said about it other than "human readable". Can we have a brief discussion about this?
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
Hi just a couple of comments: - 2.7.1.4: rp_name is labeled "human readable". Are there internationalization considerations? -5: It would be nice to see the IANA request details in this draft
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
victor kuarsingh performed to opsdir review resulting in v15, no objections.
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection