Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 2 External Data Representation Standard (XDR) Description
RFC 7863
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 39 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) Yes
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
To be honest, I can't offer much commentary on the 80 odd pages of XDR. I note that the sheperd's writeup says "“Verified XDR provided in documents is appropriate and aligns with XDR syntax and standards.” I'm not sure if that means manually verified or mechanically verified. (Hopefully the latter.) The IANA considerations delegate to [I-D.ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2]. But the IANA section there only contains a reference to RFC 7569. Maybe this draft could directly reference the RFC, or just say "No IANA considerations."?
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
My rate of number of pages reviewed per hour for this telechat just increased significantly. All those lines starting with /// are comments and should not be read, right :-) Kidding apart, I can only guess that the XDR is fine
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
I am in the same boat as Ben WRT reviewing XDR code. Given the description in the shepherd report, I trust the WG and AD have done the right thing.
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
Thank you for making the relationship between 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 very clear in this document!
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection