Additional WebRTC Audio Codecs for Interoperability
RFC 7875
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes
I remember that the "but what about THIS audio codec?" discussions were pretty contentious for a while, and wanted to say that this document does a really good job of handling that question. Thanks for producing it.
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
Shucheng LIU's OPS DIR review: **** Editorial **** * Section 2, page 3: > > o Legacy networks: In this document, legacy networks encompass the > conversational networks that are already deployed like the PSTN, > the PLMN, the IP/IMS networks offering VoIP services, including > 3GPP "4G" Evolved Packet System[TS23.002] Missing space in "Evolved Packet System[TS23.002]" * Section 2, page 3: > o PSTN:Public Switched Telephone Network Missing space. * Section 3, page 4: > Consequently, > a significant number of calls are likely to occur between terminals > supporting WebRTC endpoints and other terminals like mobile handsets, > fixed VoIP terminals, DECT terminals that do not support WebRTC > endpoints nor implement OPUS. Seems should s/terminals, DECT terminals/terminals, and DECT terminals/ * Section 3: each of the bullets is separated by two blank lines rather than a single one. * Section 4.1.1, page 5: > especially s/especially/specially/ * Section 4.1.3, page 5: > The payload format to be used for AMR-WB is described in [RFC4867] > with bandwidth efficient format and one speech frame encapsulated in > each RTP packets s/packets/packet/ * Section 4.2.1, page 6: > This include both mobile phone calls using GSM and 3G s/include/includes/ * Section 4.2.1, page 6: > such as, GSMA voice IMS profile for VoLTE in [IR.92]. Please remove the comma. * Section 4.2.1, page 6: > degrading the high efficiency over mobile radio access.References > for Missing space. * Section 4.2.3, page 7: > The payload format to be used for AMR is described in [RFC4867] with > bandwidth efficient format and one speech frame encapsulated in each > RTP packets. s/packets/packet/
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
Will Liushucheng performed the opsdir review.
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
section 3: MOS could do with a reference
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection