Skip to main content

IANA Allocation Procedures for the GMPLS OTN Signal Type Registry
RFC 7892

Yes


No Objection

(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Ben Campbell)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Comment (2016-03-14 for -04)
The Shepherd's writeup should be updated.  The document doesn't register any new types, it just updates the registration policy.

I find the description of the updated registration policies confusing.  The text reads: "…updated with the following registration policies: "Standards Action" and "Specification Required"…"   What does the "and" of these two policies mean?   I see [1] that the WG Chair had proposed: "IANA section needs to be updated indicating the registry and the following registration policies:  "Standards Action" (for Standards Track documents) and "Specification Required" (for other documents). ", but even though there were only positive comments in reply, the document did not adopt that text.  

It might be just me who finds the current text not obvious as IANA seems to not have a problem with it either [2].

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/4PRR2n5zqABNrDMhJje_raPE6Qw
[2] Message sent to the authors and IESG only.

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2016-03-10 for -04)
Updated from Last Call version for Secdir review.

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2016-03-15 for -04)
I had a DISCUSS on the registration policy, but Lou has put forth this alternative, which comes from earlier discussions:

   "Standards Action" for Standards Track documents, and "Specification
   Required" for other documents. The designated expert is any current
   CCAMP WG chair or, in the case the group is no longer active, designated
   by the IESG.

Happily clearing the DISCUSS with that text on the table.  Thanks.

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)