RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Independent Reporting of Burst/Gap Discard Metrics
RFC 8015
Yes
(Alissa Cooper)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -02)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-01 for -02)
Unknown
I have a few minor comments: -1.1, 3rd paragraph, first sentence: Is the "MUST" a new normative requirement, or a statement of fact concerning 7003? If the later, please consider restating without the 2119 keyword. - 2, last paragraph: "RECOMMENDS" also seems like a statement of fact. Please expand "GMin" on first use. -3.2, definition of "I": Why define "I=01" then forbid it's use? -5, last sentence: Is the "MAY" a statement of fact?
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-03 for -02)
Unknown
Liushucheng (Will) <liushucheng@huawei.com> provided the opsdir review. I think the discussion has been resolved to my satisfaction.
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-02 for -02)
Unknown
Sorry still not an RT(C)P expert, but one question out of curiosity: Would it be a valid operation if I send one MIR Block per burst (by adapting the measurement duration dynamically), in case I really want to know the length of each burst separately? If so (or also if not, I guess), would it make sense to give recommendations about how often one should send feedback, or is this generally covered elsewhere (provide pointer!) that applies for this case?
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-02 for -02)
Unknown
p3, 1st sentence: "it" (used twice) is ambiguous
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown