Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments Considered Harmful
RFC 8021
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
I'm not going to stand in the way of publication, but I don't think we need to publish this document: it already served it's purpose. Evidence of that is in RFC7915, rfc2460bis...
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) Yes
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
I have to say I agree with the tsv-art review that it is not fully clear to me that this explanation needs an own document. For me a much short rational for this change (1 or max. 2 paragraphs) that could be integrated in 2460bis would be sufficient (also given that this document has soe redundancy).
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection