A YANG Data Model for Routing Management
RFC 8022

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 24 and is now closed.

Search Mailarchive

Alia Atlas Yes

Deborah Brungard Yes

Benoit Claise Yes

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Ben Campbell No Objection

Comment (2016-11-01 for -24)
Should the reference to 6536. Be normative?

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Spencer Dawkins No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2016-11-02 for -24)
If there exists a draft for a yang module that augments this
in a way that includes cryptographic values (e.g. maybe for an
IPsec VPN or something) then I think that'd be a nice addition
to section 11 as an informative reference.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Comment (2016-11-02 for -24)
* Have you considered including support for the Route Information Option (RFC4191)? Seems like it would be useful.

* default-lifetime is defined with a range of 0..9000 in this document but the upper limit will be raised to 65535 if and when draft-ietf-6man-maxra is approved. Is there a mechanism by which you can easily support this increased upper limit?

Mirja K├╝hlewind No Objection

Terry Manderson No Objection

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

Kathleen Moriarty No Objection