Multi-Chassis Passive Optical Network (MC-PON) Protection in MPLS
RFC 8024

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Deborah Brungard Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2016-09-14 for -04)
No email
send info
I was surprised by this text in the Abstract,

   MPLS is being deployed deeper into operator networks, often to or
   past the access network node. 
   
because I don't think what this is saying, matches text like this in the Introduction,

   Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) is being extended to the edge
   of operator networks, as is described in the the Multi-Segment
   Pseudowires with Passive Optical Network (PON) access use case
   [RFC6456]. 

Is it "to the edge", or "past the access network node"? But if there's no reason to use a different description, you might consider using the same description in both places.

Of course, you folks are the experts on how MPLS is deployed ... and maybe I'm just confused by which direction you mean when you say "deeper"!

I am also interested in resolution of Stephen's Discuss.

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2016-09-27 for -04)
No email
send info
Thanks for resolving my discuss. (See the email thread for
details.)

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2016-09-28)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS.

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2016-09-14 for -04)
No email
send info
I agree with Stephen's discuss and the SecDir reviewer.

Alvaro Retana No Objection