Updating When Standards Track Documents May Refer Normatively to Documents at a Lower Level
RFC 8067
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana Yes
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes
Should there be any recommendation on where IESG should record that a particular DownRef was not Ladt Called, but is considered "safe"? E.g. using a datatracker comment, IESG telechat meeting notes.
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) Yes
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes
do it
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) Yes
I support this change because delaying a doc to repeat the last call often doesn't make sense. However, I guess it would be easy to have tooling support that would automatically add a list of downrefs to the last call text (given it's already in the nits check)...?
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes
I do think that our discussion about ensuring that downrefs are called out at Last Call time, whether or not they're in the downref registry, is headed in the right direction.
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) Yes
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) Yes
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection