Using Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile with Feedback with Layered Codecs
RFC 8082
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes
- Section 5: s/dependent from each other/dependent on each other/ - Section 6: The formulation "the authors' current understanding" seems a bit out of place for a document that is a product of a WG/the IETF; perhaps "based on current information" or some such would be better.
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
- MRST, MRMT, SRST - expand on 1st use please, not sure if there are more of those too - Just checking: I assume when "repairing" something, that requires the same security properties be maintained or re-established and that there's no bidding down attack here that e.g. a middlebox could mount here?
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection