The "file" URI Scheme
RFC 8089

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.

(Alexey Melnikov) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Comment (2016-12-14 for -15)
No email
send info
I haven't heard the details of Stephen's Discuss.

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2016-12-14 for -15)
No email
send info
- I support Stephen's DISCUSS

- Section 5: "Implementers MUST research" and "Care MUST be taken" both seem like requirements on people, not on implementations. Furthermore, "research" and "taking of care" are vague in terms of expected results. Can these be recast into concrete expectations of implementation behavior?

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Comment (2016-12-13 for -15)
No email
send info
I support Stephen's DISCUSS.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2016-12-13 for -15)
No email
send info
I also support Stephen's Discuss (which is pretty much "we need to explicitly decide whether we can live with this", as I understand it).

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2016-12-01 for -14)
No email
send info
Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com> performed the opsdir review.

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2016-12-14 for -15)
No email
send info
I support Stephen's DISCUSS.

Alvaro Retana No Objection