Skip to main content

Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability
RFC 8102

Yes

(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)

No Objection

(Alissa Cooper)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)

No Record


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -10) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -10) Unknown

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -10) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2017-01-20 for -12) Unknown

                            
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -10) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -10) Unknown

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -10) Unknown

                            
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2017-01-16 for -10) Unknown
Overall comment: This reads rather like an informational rfc; however given that rfc7490 is standards track, I guess that's fine.

More specific comments:
- More abbreviations could be spelled out to make it easier to read.
- Not sure what section 3 tells me; but I'm also not an expert. 
- Also section 3: "As already specified in Section 2.3.4 to limit the computational
   overhead of the proposed approach, forward SPF computations MUST be
   run on a selected subset from the entire set of PQ-nodes computed in
   the network, with a finite limit on the number of PQ-nodes in the
   subset."
   I guess you don't need the upper case MUST here.
- Also then in section 2.3.4: "To limit the computational overhead of the approach proposed, this
   document proposes that implementations MUST choose a subset from the
   entire set of PQ-nodes computed in the network, with a finite limit
   on the number of PQ-nodes in the subset."
   Saying "this doc recommends" and "MUST" in the same sentence seem inaccurate.
- And also section 2.3.4: Could you maybe suggest or discuss an appropriate default value?
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -10) Unknown

                            
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -10) Unknown

                            
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -10) Unknown

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Record
No Record (2017-01-19 for -10) Unknown
awaiting clearance of the ops review