Skip to main content

Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability
RFC 8102

Yes

Alvaro Retana
(Alia Atlas)

No Objection

(Alissa Cooper)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)

No Record


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -10)

                            

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-20 for -12)

                            

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-16 for -10)
Overall comment: This reads rather like an informational rfc; however given that rfc7490 is standards track, I guess that's fine.

More specific comments:
- More abbreviations could be spelled out to make it easier to read.
- Not sure what section 3 tells me; but I'm also not an expert. 
- Also section 3: "As already specified in Section 2.3.4 to limit the computational
   overhead of the proposed approach, forward SPF computations MUST be
   run on a selected subset from the entire set of PQ-nodes computed in
   the network, with a finite limit on the number of PQ-nodes in the
   subset."
   I guess you don't need the upper case MUST here.
- Also then in section 2.3.4: "To limit the computational overhead of the approach proposed, this
   document proposes that implementations MUST choose a subset from the
   entire set of PQ-nodes computed in the network, with a finite limit
   on the number of PQ-nodes in the subset."
   Saying "this doc recommends" and "MUST" in the same sentence seem inaccurate.
- And also section 2.3.4: Could you maybe suggest or discuss an appropriate default value?

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -10)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Record

No Record (2017-01-19 for -10)
awaiting clearance of the ops review