Locator/ID Separation Protocol Delegated Database Tree (LISP-DDT)
RFC 8111
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
I have no objections to the publication of this document. However, I do wonder why an extension to the DNS infrastructure wasn't used instead. The Gen-ART review provided a significant set of good comments that should be taken into consideration.
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> performed the opsdir review
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
Would it be worth it to potentially think about/document potential attacks against this system? I didn't think myself about how such an attack could look like but given that location and identity are potential sensitive data it might be worth it...
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for handling the sig alg issue.
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection