Skip to main content

Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations
RFC 8113

Yes

(Deborah Brungard)

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana (was Discuss) No Objection

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -04)

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-30 for -04)
I would also like to see Alvaro's concerns handled.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-31 for -04)
- 4.1, last paragraph: I'm confused by the statement that "15" is reserved for experimental use. The table says it's reserved for the LISP Shared Extension Message. I recognize that that message is in fact experimental, but I would interpret "reserved for experimental use" to indicate things that people can use for other experimental purpose.



- (nit)  Abstract: Please expand LISP on first use in the abstract (in addition to the existing expansion in the introduction.)

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-31 for -04)
I am watching for resolution of Alvaro's Discuss points.

I'm also really curious about point a in his Comments. That would be good to unravel.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2017-02-02 for -05)
Thanks for taking care of my DISCUSS.

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)