Next-Generation Pan-European eCall
RFC 8147
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 22 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you for quick handling of my DISCUSS points. One nit: in 14.1: Contact: Apps Area Working Group (apps-discuss@ietf.org) This should probably be art@ietf.org
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
Minor comments: - sec 9.1.1.1: Is there a case where 'received' could be not 'true'. I mean how can you acknowledge something that you didn't receive? - I find the wording used saying "This document registers .." (in the whole document) not fully approrpiate because the main purpose of this doc is the spcification of the usage of these registrations. I would propose the following, e.g. OLD "This document registers "urn:service:test.sos.ecall" for eCall test calls." NEW "This document specifies "urn:service:test.sos.ecall" for eCall test calls and registers it in section X."
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection