Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2
RFC 8164
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes
I'm balloting "yes", but I have a few minor comments: - Abstract: I agree with the GenART review that the limitations should be mentioned in the abstract, or at least early in the document. - Note to readers: Will this stay in the RFC? - Introduction: What is the nature of the experiment? Is there an expectation to promote it to standards track in the future? Even if the answer is "We need to get implementation/deployment experience", it's helpful to say "out loud".
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes
Good to see this finished. I hope it sees good deployment. Thanks!
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection