HTTP Immutable Responses
RFC 8246
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
Warren Kumari No Objection
Cute.
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) Yes
Presumably, the "Note to Readers" section should be removed prior to publication. Please either remove it, add a note to it that it should be removed, or add an RFC editor note to this effect. Trivial nits that aren't worth re-spinning the document before, but which you may wish to consider if you have any other reasons to revise it: - Put quotation marks around "immutable" in the abstract. - Replace "assures" with "insures" in the abstract (or rephase along the lines of "...assures the client that it never..."). - In the third paragraph of the Introduction, replace "Users that..." with "Users who..." - The cache control registry currently contains section numbers for every citation. Would update section 4 to indicate: "[this document, section 2]"
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes
I'm honestly surprised that we haven't already done this. Thanks for doing it now!
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection