Graceful BGP Session Shutdown
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
(Ben Campbell) (was No Objection) Yes
Comment (2017-12-13 for -12)
I'm balloting "yes" because I think it's important to publish this. But, like Alvaro, I wonder why this is not standards track, BCP, or just about anything but informational. So I support his DISCUSS, including his the comments on how to resolve it. -1, last paragraph: This references RFC 8174, but does not use the actual 8174 boilerplate. Is there a reason not to do so?
Warren Kumari Yes
Alvaro Retana (was Discuss) Yes
(Alia Atlas) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection
Comment (2017-12-14 for -12)
I also believe this should be standards track. Or is there any good reason why it should not be standards track similar as other docs that define well known communities?