Skip to main content

Graceful BGP Session Shutdown
RFC 8326

Yes

Alvaro Retana
Warren Kumari

No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana (was Discuss) Yes

Warren Kumari Yes

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) (was No Objection) Yes

Yes (2017-12-13 for -12)
I'm balloting "yes" because I think it's important to publish this. But, like Alvaro,  I wonder why this is not standards track, BCP, or just about anything but informational. So I support his DISCUSS, including his the comments on how to resolve it.

-1, last paragraph: This references RFC 8174, but does not use the actual 8174 boilerplate. Is there a reason not to do so?

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-12-14 for -12)
I also believe this should be standards track. Or is there any good reason why it should not be standards track similar as other docs that define well known communities?

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)

                            

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -12)