A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)
RFC 8349
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
Warren Kumari No Objection
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) Yes
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
There are a few instances of 2119 keywords in lower case. Please consider using the boilerplate from RFC 8174.
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection
* Lots of places in the document where NMDA is misspelled as NDMA. Please fix. * Section 9.1. The ranges for AdvDefaultLifetime and MaxRtrAdvInterval have been changed by RFC-to-be-8319 to update the values specified in RFC4861. Please change these ranges to the new values. OLD: leaf max-rtr-adv-interval { type uint16 { range "4..1800"; } NEW: leaf max-rtr-adv-interval { type uint16 { range "4..65535"; } OLD: leaf default-lifetime { type uint16 { range "0..9000"; } NEW: leaf default-lifetime { type uint16 { range "0..65535"; }
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection