Use Cases for IPv6 Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING)
RFC 8354
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana Yes
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
I share the Gen-ART reviewer's concerns about the trust model that underlies SRv6. But it seems the source of those concerns is that actual spec (draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header), not this use case document.
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
Minor question regarding SPRING in Core networks (section 2.5): Why is SR here bettter than MPLS (which I guess is used today for this use case)? In general it would probably have been nice to also talk a bit about how this is better/different than existing technologies.
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection