Experimental Codepoint Allocation for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
RFC 8356

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Alia Atlas) Yes

Deborah Brungard Yes

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Comment (2018-01-10 for -04)
No email
send info
I'd like to see the Gen-ART reviewer's comment addressed per the discussion on the list.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

Comment (2018-01-08 for -04)
No email
send info
Like EKR I'm confused / concerned about what happens if 2 experiments choose the same codepoint -- while there isn't really anything that the document can really do to prevent it, I think that it is worth having a bit more text mentioning that implementors should consider this, and e.g experimental use should handle failures differently to production.
Seeing as EKR is carrying the DISCUSS I'll ballot NoObj and follow along.

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

(Eric Rescorla) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2018-01-10 for -04)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my discuss

(Adam Roach) No Objection