Experimental Codepoint Allocation for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
RFC 8356
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Alia Atlas) Yes
Deborah Brungard Yes
Alvaro Retana Yes
(Ben Campbell) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
Alissa Cooper No Objection
Comment (2018-01-10 for -04)
No email
send info
send info
I'd like to see the Gen-ART reviewer's comment addressed per the discussion on the list.
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection
Warren Kumari No Objection
Comment (2018-01-08 for -04)
No email
send info
send info
Like EKR I'm confused / concerned about what happens if 2 experiments choose the same codepoint -- while there isn't really anything that the document can really do to prevent it, I think that it is worth having a bit more text mentioning that implementors should consider this, and e.g experimental use should handle failures differently to production. Seeing as EKR is carrying the DISCUSS I'll ballot NoObj and follow along.
(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection
(Eric Rescorla) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2018-01-10 for -04)
No email
send info
send info
Thank you for addressing my discuss