Experimental Codepoint Allocation for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
RFC 8356
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana Yes
Warren Kumari No Objection
Like EKR I'm confused / concerned about what happens if 2 experiments choose the same codepoint -- while there isn't really anything that the document can really do to prevent it, I think that it is worth having a bit more text mentioning that implementors should consider this, and e.g experimental use should handle failures differently to production. Seeing as EKR is carrying the DISCUSS I'll ballot NoObj and follow along.
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
I'd like to see the Gen-ART reviewer's comment addressed per the discussion on the list.
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you for addressing my discuss
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection