Use of Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) Signatures in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
RFC 8419
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
Warren Kumari No Objection
I am in no way a subject matter expert in this field, but the bits I did understand were all easily understandable :-)
(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) Yes
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes
Thank you for your work on this draft and for addressing the SecDir review comments. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/FIm8MqdrQSOwXAsRkfJ27VFUF2k
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection
Section 1.2: CMS values are generated using ASN.1 [X680], which uses the Basic Encoding Rules (BER) and the Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER) [X690]. Recommend: CMS values are generated using ASN.1 [X680], using the Basic Encoding Rules (BER) and the Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER) [X690]. (Rationale: ASN.1 has many more encodings than this, and the original phrasing implies that these are the only two.) I'm a little surprised that there are no citations for Curve25519, Curve488, and "Schnorr's signature system." If it is realistic add citations for these, I believe it would be an improvement.
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection