Skip to main content

IMAP4 Extension for Returning MYRIGHTS Information in Extended LIST
RFC 8440

Yes

(Alexey Melnikov)

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
Warren Kumari
(Alissa Cooper)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Eric Rescorla)
(Ignas Bagdonas)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -04)

                            

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-06-06 for -05)
> 9.  Acknowledgments
>
>   This document is based largely on RFC5819.

Please consider adding RFC 5819 as an informative reference.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-06-06 for -05)
Please consider using the boilerplate from RFC 8174 instead of 2119. The draft includes at least one lower case "may". That boilerplate also enables things like lower-case "should" rather than the more awkward "ought to", which has connotations of criticism or moral judgement in much of the US.

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-06-05 for -05)
Please consider using the RFC 8174 boilerplate (instead of the RFC 2119 one) -- there is
a lowercased "may" in the document.

Per the secdir review, please incorporate the security
considerations of RFC 4314 (e.g., by reference).

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Ignas Bagdonas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-06-06 for -05)
Comment to the AD: All IMAP shepherd write-ups say "7. There have been no IPR disclosures for this spec.", however, questions 7 is about confirming that the authors are not aware of any IPR (that might not have been disclosed yet). Was that checked with the authors?

Also sec 3: "This document extends the LIST command with a new return option
   [RFC5258], "MYRIGHTS", which allows the client to request all of the
   desired information in a single command. "
 The "which" clause is confusing to me...  or should this also be attribute and "LIST-MYRIGHTS" here?

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)